<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SubmitYourArticle Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review</link>
	<description>Article Submission Software and Tools Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:08:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-59748</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-59748</guid>
		<description>Tyler, 

Please go here:

http://articlesontap.com/buy-spun-articles

- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler, </p>
<p>Please go here:</p>
<p><a href="http://articlesontap.com/buy-spun-articles" rel="nofollow">http://articlesontap.com/buy-spun-articles</a></p>
<p>- Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-59480</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-59480</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I am interested in purchasing spin syntax from you. Just a couple of quick questions:

Do you offer quadspun sentence spin syntax? (Spin syntax with the sentences spun four times)
If so, what is the cost for an article of around 500 words?
How can I order?

Thanks, Tyler</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am interested in purchasing spin syntax from you. Just a couple of quick questions:</p>
<p>Do you offer quadspun sentence spin syntax? (Spin syntax with the sentences spun four times)<br />
If so, what is the cost for an article of around 500 words?<br />
How can I order?</p>
<p>Thanks, Tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-59243</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-59243</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron,

#1. Well it was not written by a 3rd party writer - it was written by ME 2 years ago. To be fair, this review is now dated. And should probably be updated. But at this time, we have no interest in using SYA nor testing it again, maybe at a later date.

#2. It&#039;s not inconsistent, go back and read, right in the first paragraph I stated that this is nothing new and novel and that UAW does 1000&#039;s compared to their 100&#039;s - where is that inconsistent? And then I explain, that we saw no proof that any of those articles even were distributed anywhere. 

#3. Aaron - did you even read this or just skim? We list about 6 other places we would use above SYA at that time? I didn&#039;t take the training, wasn&#039;t something I was interested in. I certainly did not join SYA for training. One of our site commentators mentioned they found it helpful, so I made mention of it. There is a lot more information in the commentary as well. And what offer? Our bonus offer? We offer a bonus at the end of every review for anyone that chooses to use our link. So what? The review was over. We gave our conclusion - we said we will not be using it any longer and stated what other programs we recommended above it, therefore from that one can conclude that we DID NOT believe it to be worth it, or we would have continued to use it. You obviously didn&#039;t even read the review, and just came here to drop a link to your site - which you didn&#039;t get.

It seems like this comment was written by a 3rd party commenter, since you don&#039;t appear to have actually read the review. 

Thanks for stopping by

- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,</p>
<p>#1. Well it was not written by a 3rd party writer &#8211; it was written by ME 2 years ago. To be fair, this review is now dated. And should probably be updated. But at this time, we have no interest in using SYA nor testing it again, maybe at a later date.</p>
<p>#2. It&#8217;s not inconsistent, go back and read, right in the first paragraph I stated that this is nothing new and novel and that UAW does 1000&#8242;s compared to their 100&#8242;s &#8211; where is that inconsistent? And then I explain, that we saw no proof that any of those articles even were distributed anywhere. </p>
<p>#3. Aaron &#8211; did you even read this or just skim? We list about 6 other places we would use above SYA at that time? I didn&#8217;t take the training, wasn&#8217;t something I was interested in. I certainly did not join SYA for training. One of our site commentators mentioned they found it helpful, so I made mention of it. There is a lot more information in the commentary as well. And what offer? Our bonus offer? We offer a bonus at the end of every review for anyone that chooses to use our link. So what? The review was over. We gave our conclusion &#8211; we said we will not be using it any longer and stated what other programs we recommended above it, therefore from that one can conclude that we DID NOT believe it to be worth it, or we would have continued to use it. You obviously didn&#8217;t even read the review, and just came here to drop a link to your site &#8211; which you didn&#8217;t get.</p>
<p>It seems like this comment was written by a 3rd party commenter, since you don&#8217;t appear to have actually read the review. </p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by</p>
<p>- Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-59241</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 06:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-59241</guid>
		<description>2 things I don&#039;t like about this review.

1. Smells like a third party writer.

2. Inconsistencies. At the beginning, the 6 major directories + 100s of smaller directories seem to be a plus. But later, it seems as though SYA only has 6 to submit too.

3. No conclusion/Summary.

So, it&#039;s priced a little high, but is it worth it? Why would anyone consider it? Any alternatives? Is the training useful? etc etc etc.

After price, it suddenly jumped to your offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 things I don&#8217;t like about this review.</p>
<p>1. Smells like a third party writer.</p>
<p>2. Inconsistencies. At the beginning, the 6 major directories + 100s of smaller directories seem to be a plus. But later, it seems as though SYA only has 6 to submit too.</p>
<p>3. No conclusion/Summary.</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s priced a little high, but is it worth it? Why would anyone consider it? Any alternatives? Is the training useful? etc etc etc.</p>
<p>After price, it suddenly jumped to your offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris guzman</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-57935</link>
		<dc:creator>cris guzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 22:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-57935</guid>
		<description>Nice review. Although I think almost all review sites just want to get commissions and a lot of times give favorable reviews even when the product is really not worth the money, this particular review proves otherwise - it proves that you can be honest about it. Somehow I agree with Paul (above) that you make an updated review of SYA&#039;s new $67 a month service just to be fair, though I personally think that for the same price you&#039;ll get better results with some other product. Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. Although I think almost all review sites just want to get commissions and a lot of times give favorable reviews even when the product is really not worth the money, this particular review proves otherwise &#8211; it proves that you can be honest about it. Somehow I agree with Paul (above) that you make an updated review of SYA&#8217;s new $67 a month service just to be fair, though I personally think that for the same price you&#8217;ll get better results with some other product. Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-48814</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-48814</guid>
		<description>I have a huge concern with anyone using these types of submitters unless you can slowly trickle the content into directories. Having done SEO effectively for many years my chief concern is how Google is making changes to the Panda algorithms which will eventually have the ability to decipher articles which are spun . Spinning articles does not work unless the content is spun with precision so the resulting article makes sense. Keep this in mind when you are considering submission software and spinning articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a huge concern with anyone using these types of submitters unless you can slowly trickle the content into directories. Having done SEO effectively for many years my chief concern is how Google is making changes to the Panda algorithms which will eventually have the ability to decipher articles which are spun . Spinning articles does not work unless the content is spun with precision so the resulting article makes sense. Keep this in mind when you are considering submission software and spinning articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Cortez</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-36633</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cortez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-36633</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I would like to see an updated review of SYA&#039;s new $67 per month service.  So if anyone has actually used it for at least 90 days and is happy with the results, I&#039;d like to read about it here.

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I would like to see an updated review of SYA&#8217;s new $67 per month service.  So if anyone has actually used it for at least 90 days and is happy with the results, I&#8217;d like to read about it here.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-25882</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 02:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-25882</guid>
		<description>Does the panda update affect this type of marketing now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the panda update affect this type of marketing now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-25291</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 03:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-25291</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by again Steve, I have been meaning to do an updated review of SYA - but time has not allowed me too, hopefully soon.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by again Steve, I have been meaning to do an updated review of SYA &#8211; but time has not allowed me too, hopefully soon.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Shaw</title>
		<link>http://articlesubmissionreview.com/article-submitter/submityourarticle-review/comment-page-1#comment-24130</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://articlesubmissionreview.com/?p=184#comment-24130</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike

To update your review, SYA now offers a number of new features, some of which have been in place for a few months now:

- Multi-pen names
- The ability for you to copy and paste your pre spun article directly (as Ann and Stephen kindly point out above)
- Submissions to hundreds of blogs/niche websites
- A completely revamped members area

Thanks
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike</p>
<p>To update your review, SYA now offers a number of new features, some of which have been in place for a few months now:</p>
<p>- Multi-pen names<br />
- The ability for you to copy and paste your pre spun article directly (as Ann and Stephen kindly point out above)<br />
- Submissions to hundreds of blogs/niche websites<br />
- A completely revamped members area</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

